New Step by Step Map For speaker production order jurisdiction case law in india
New Step by Step Map For speaker production order jurisdiction case law in india
Blog Article
III) During the Variation of the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second Model) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed into the petitioner and others was simple existence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there is often a delay of someday within the registration of FIR which has not been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness of your alleged prevalence along with the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession in the petitioners continues to be tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place to become the real brothers of the deceased but they did not respond whatsoever on the confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, just one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not search much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation concerning why her arrest wasn't effected after making of the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on numerous events that extra judicial confession of the accused is a weak sort of evidence which might be 489 f case laws manoeuvred from the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution is additionally depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word regarding presence of some light at the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners collectively on a motorcycle at 4.
maintaining the conviction awarded to your appellant reduce the sentence of your appellant from imprisonment for life to 1 already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
extensive period petitioner wasn't viewed as for promotion, meeting from the departmental promotion committee and look at the petitioner (Promotion)
Power to levy tax and to legislate on immovable property which include tax on yearly rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of your grid project and submitted that sufficient mitigation measures were in place to render any prospective adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to be created.
The Court regarded the case being maintainable under Article 184 (three) Considering that the Risk and encroachment alleged were like to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
department concerned shall offer the complete set of ACRs on the concerned officer to DPC very well in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
I) The above referred case FIR, for that murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered around the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid who is father on the petitioner and as per story of FIR, the petitioner is an eyewkness on the occurrence.
Finally, an important contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration via the Court under Article 184 (three), continues to be setting a precedent which allows for much easier access for the public to technique the superior courts as well as subordinate courts on environment related issues.
She did note that the boy still needed substantial therapy in order to manage with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Safe and sound with other children.” The boy was getting counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved with the actions.
It also addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and 120 of the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded to your appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )